Comparisons made

  • The impact assessment on wine containers considered 7 different packaging alternatives.
  • 2 x 1.5 Litre Metallised Laminate Bag-in-Box
  • 2 x 1.5 Litre EVOH based Bag-in-Box
  • A 3 Litre Metallised Laminate Bag-in-Box
  • 4 x 0.75 Litre Glass Bottle
  • 3 x 1 Litre Liquid Packaging Board Container
  • 2 x 1.5 Litre Aluminium Pouch
  • A 3 Litre Aluminium Pouch

Results

  • Resource efficiency was the defining factor for wine containers comparison
  • Glass bottles performed particularly badly due to its weight - worse in eight of the ten categories including acidification and global warming
  • The liquid packaging board container was worse in terms of ozone layer depletion, but it was the best option in five of the ten impact categories
  • Transportation played an important factor, with BIB options being superior at low distribution distances
  • Overall bag-in-box containers were superior to the other packaging and competitive with the liquid packaging board. The bigger bag-in-box packs gave even greater benefits per litre packed.


Next - Global warming potential or Key findings

Related Pages

Global Warming Potential - Wine
 
Key findings - Wine
 
 





 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

© 2008 DS Smith Plastics Ltd. All rights reserved.   Site Map  |  Terms of Use  |  Terms of Sale & Purchase  |  Contact Us