The impact assessment on wine containers considered 7 different packaging alternatives.
2 x 1.5 Litre Metallised Laminate Bag-in-Box
2 x 1.5 Litre EVOH based Bag-in-Box
A 3 Litre Metallised Laminate Bag-in-Box
4 x 0.75 Litre Glass Bottle
3 x 1 Litre Liquid Packaging Board Container
2 x 1.5 Litre Aluminium Pouch
A 3 Litre Aluminium Pouch
Results
Resource efficiency was the defining factor for wine containers comparison
Glass bottles performed particularly badly due to its weight - worse in eight of the ten categories including acidification and global warming
The liquid packaging board container was worse in terms of ozone layer depletion, but it was the best option in five of the ten impact categories
Transportation played an important factor, with BIB options being superior at low distribution distances
Overall bag-in-box containers were superior to the other packaging and competitive with the liquid packaging board. The bigger bag-in-box packs gave even greater benefits per litre packed.